Longtime fans know I'm part of a collective of writers (collective? Or should that be gaggle? a flock? a pride!). We have both a website and a blog and this week is my turn over there. Stop by and join the discussion!
Play safe,
Diana
PS. These are the last few days to get "I Stay a Little Longer" for 99 cents. Price goes up to $1.99 on Wednesday, so get your copy before the price hike! Available in all ebook formats.
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Saturday, April 28, 2012
I've been cleaning...
Spring is here (even if the weather is wonky) and I get the urge to clean house. Maybe its because I read too many novels with industrious Victorian mothers who feel it necessary to strip the house of furnishings and give every room the once-over, maybe because my mother scolded a sense of order into me. But whatever the reason, every spring I find myself going through rooms with vacuum in one hand, dust cloth in the other and toting my family behind (who are never as enthusiastic as I am for some reason).
The hardest clean-up, however, is always the study. In particular, the shelves of books in the study. We have well over a thousand-book library with six shelves a yard long devoted to Shakespeare alone. Another seven of the same length are scripts of plays (we were both theatre majors in college and our daughter just graduated with the same degree. She's a stage manager and always looking for her next gig. If you happen to know of any openings., drop me a line!).
It isn't the dusting of them (that's easy), it's the cleaning out to make way for new. What do I give away? Notice I didn't say "toss away." I can't toss books into the recycling bin. On the very rare occasions when a paperback book has become just so disintegrated that its missing pages or that pages are torn, I agonize and apologize to the author when it goes into the blue bin.
But give away I do. Our local library stopped taking used books a couple of years ago so for quite some time the unwanted, but in good shape books collected in boxes in my attic. Then I found out the Salvation Army will take them. I've forgotten how many boxes I took them in that first drop, but it was a lot - and I've given them several more since.
The fact that they're going to a good home, however, doesn't make it any easier. I have to harden my heart and suck it up like a big girl every time a book leaves my hands. What is it about them that makes them so precious? It's not like I don't have enough (obviously we have too many). I grew up in a house that allowed me to keep all the books I bought, so there's no deep-rooted need to hoard in my childhood.
Perhaps it's because they are works of art. For they are, you know. Every one of them. Some are more to my liking than others, but in truth, each one is a creative endeavor on the part of an individual who put thought and time into the creation. One would not give away (or toss!) a Mondrian or Monet, so why would I get rid of a Nora Roberts or David Eddings?
But it's spring and cleaning-time is here. For now the Star Trek books are safe (two shelves worth, a yard across), as are the scripts and Shakespeare. But some of the others have to go.Let the agony begin!
Play safe,
Diana
The hardest clean-up, however, is always the study. In particular, the shelves of books in the study. We have well over a thousand-book library with six shelves a yard long devoted to Shakespeare alone. Another seven of the same length are scripts of plays (we were both theatre majors in college and our daughter just graduated with the same degree. She's a stage manager and always looking for her next gig. If you happen to know of any openings., drop me a line!).
It isn't the dusting of them (that's easy), it's the cleaning out to make way for new. What do I give away? Notice I didn't say "toss away." I can't toss books into the recycling bin. On the very rare occasions when a paperback book has become just so disintegrated that its missing pages or that pages are torn, I agonize and apologize to the author when it goes into the blue bin.
But give away I do. Our local library stopped taking used books a couple of years ago so for quite some time the unwanted, but in good shape books collected in boxes in my attic. Then I found out the Salvation Army will take them. I've forgotten how many boxes I took them in that first drop, but it was a lot - and I've given them several more since.
The fact that they're going to a good home, however, doesn't make it any easier. I have to harden my heart and suck it up like a big girl every time a book leaves my hands. What is it about them that makes them so precious? It's not like I don't have enough (obviously we have too many). I grew up in a house that allowed me to keep all the books I bought, so there's no deep-rooted need to hoard in my childhood.
Perhaps it's because they are works of art. For they are, you know. Every one of them. Some are more to my liking than others, but in truth, each one is a creative endeavor on the part of an individual who put thought and time into the creation. One would not give away (or toss!) a Mondrian or Monet, so why would I get rid of a Nora Roberts or David Eddings?
But it's spring and cleaning-time is here. For now the Star Trek books are safe (two shelves worth, a yard across), as are the scripts and Shakespeare. But some of the others have to go.Let the agony begin!
Play safe,
Diana
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Characterization III
How well do you know your characters? Do you know what they hold as truths so evident they don't even need to be spoken? Do you know what abhors them? What makes them smile? What revolts them and everything in between?
When we speak of characterization, we're really talking about what makes up a person's character. What he/she holds as near and dear. How the character behaves when no one's watching. Who he/she is at the very core of his/her being.
To that end, below the jump is a jpg. you can print out and use as a way to rank what's important to your protagonists (and antagonists -- they have character, too!). Take your time over this. What is the most important value your characters holds as truth? What values are less important?
Then go through your manuscript and see if that truth shines through. Does your character actually behave the way he/she would if that value were the most important? Can you create a scene (or even add in a line or two) that reflects the values not deemed important?
For example: Two people in a fancy restaurant having just finished an expensive meal. Both pull out credit cards to split the bill and one waves the other off. "My turn," the character says.
We know several things from this generic scene, including that one character is generous with money. That's a value statement. Now imagine the other character comes back with this:
"No, I won't be beholding to you for anything. I'll pay for my own meal and you can keep your money."
An entirely new value comes into play. Was the first character's motivation altruism? Or power? Is the second character's reaction based on independence? Or is it a plea to save face?
You see how important values are to the character of a character?
(SIDENOTE: To some writers, plot is the most important element of a story. Think Lord of the Rings or the Star Wars trilogy. What happens is more important than what the characters think of what's happening. Any of the current crop of superhero movies tends to be the same (with the arguable exception of the latest incarnation of the Batman series with Christian Bale in the title role).
To other writers, however, character is the most important element. Who the events happen to are the most interesting part. The motivations, the thoughts that go on inside their heads - these form the basis for the story. Think Jane Eyre or Stuck in Neutral or heck, anything by yours truly!
(sidenote to the sidenote: wait till you get a load of the cover on this copy of Jane Eyre. What on earth were they thinking???)
Both approaches obviously have their place. And of course, the best literature is that which equalizes the two; stories where both what happens and who it happens to are of equal interest to the reader. Feel free to name your favorites in the comments.)
Okay, get to work! Remember, the jpg is below the jump and you can save to your computer and print out as needed. What are the most important values to your character?
When we speak of characterization, we're really talking about what makes up a person's character. What he/she holds as near and dear. How the character behaves when no one's watching. Who he/she is at the very core of his/her being.
To that end, below the jump is a jpg. you can print out and use as a way to rank what's important to your protagonists (and antagonists -- they have character, too!). Take your time over this. What is the most important value your characters holds as truth? What values are less important?
Then go through your manuscript and see if that truth shines through. Does your character actually behave the way he/she would if that value were the most important? Can you create a scene (or even add in a line or two) that reflects the values not deemed important?
For example: Two people in a fancy restaurant having just finished an expensive meal. Both pull out credit cards to split the bill and one waves the other off. "My turn," the character says.
We know several things from this generic scene, including that one character is generous with money. That's a value statement. Now imagine the other character comes back with this:
"No, I won't be beholding to you for anything. I'll pay for my own meal and you can keep your money."
An entirely new value comes into play. Was the first character's motivation altruism? Or power? Is the second character's reaction based on independence? Or is it a plea to save face?
You see how important values are to the character of a character?
(SIDENOTE: To some writers, plot is the most important element of a story. Think Lord of the Rings or the Star Wars trilogy. What happens is more important than what the characters think of what's happening. Any of the current crop of superhero movies tends to be the same (with the arguable exception of the latest incarnation of the Batman series with Christian Bale in the title role).
To other writers, however, character is the most important element. Who the events happen to are the most interesting part. The motivations, the thoughts that go on inside their heads - these form the basis for the story. Think Jane Eyre or Stuck in Neutral or heck, anything by yours truly!
(sidenote to the sidenote: wait till you get a load of the cover on this copy of Jane Eyre. What on earth were they thinking???)
Both approaches obviously have their place. And of course, the best literature is that which equalizes the two; stories where both what happens and who it happens to are of equal interest to the reader. Feel free to name your favorites in the comments.)
Okay, get to work! Remember, the jpg is below the jump and you can save to your computer and print out as needed. What are the most important values to your character?
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Inspiration
Artists often choose their subjects from the pages of literary works. From the ancient tales of the Ramayana to the 20th century writings of JRR Tolkien, painters, sketch artists and sculptors have been inspired by story.
But the reverse is also true. A sketch, a photograph or a painting often works to inspire a writer. Who is the person in that painting? What is his/her story? What's happened just before this photo was taken to make this scene so lonely, so scary, so beautiful?
When using art for inspiration, it helps to go back to the old newpaperman questions: Who, What, Where, When and Why? Add in How and you have an entire story.
Below are two pictures you can use for inspiration, although any photograph or artwork will do. Use the questions below to get the creative juices flowing:
- Who: Who is in the picture? Why is he/she there? Who is missing from the pic?
- What: What is going on in the picture? What is the action? What emotions are evoked by looking at the scene? What emotions are the people in the picture expressing? Why do you think they're having those emotions?
- Where: Remember, there are three ways to think of setting: geographical, historical and physical. To that end, Where is the scene set as far as location? What time period is it? What are the physical details of the scene?
- When: When does this scene take place? The time of day? the season? Are there any cultural mores that come into play because of when it's set?
- Why: Why on earth would anyone want to capture this scene to begin with? Why is it important?
- How: How did this person (these people) get here in the first place? How will they get out of their situation? How will they react to what is happening? (NOTE: This is where you build your conflict. The others are all details, but here is where it turns into a story instead of a news report).
Ready?
Who: Who is in the picture? Why is he/she there? Who is missing from the pic?
What: What is going on in the picture? What is the action? What emotions are evoked by looking at the scene? What emotions are the people in the picture expressing? Why do you think they're having those emotions?
Where: Remember, there are three ways to think of setting: geographical, historical and physical. To that end, Where is the scene set as far as location? What time period is it? What are the physical details of the scene?
When: When does this scene take place? The time of day? the season? Are there any cultural mores that come into play because of when it's set?
Why: Why on earth would anyone want to capture this scene to begin with? Why is it important?
How: How did this person (these people) get here in the first place? How will they get out of their situation? How will they react to what is happening? (NOTE: This is where you build your conflict. The others are all details, but here is where it turns into a story instead of a news report).
Go write!
If you like this workshop, please donate to the cause!
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Reading!
Okay, so a week off from the day job leads to two things: lots of writing (nearly 10,000 words this week -- newest novel is nearly finished!) and lots of reading (3 books this week!). Will hold off telling you about the latest work in progress (will save for a later post when the first draft is done. Don't want to jinx it.) but here are the four books I read:
Decided I didn't want to wait to borrow the rest of the Hunger Games series, so went out and bought Catching Fire and Mockingjay. I really liked Suzanne Collins' writing style. She's clean and sparse, yet I never had trouble envisioning the characters in my head. Am I the only one, though, who sees a young Sean Astin in the role of Peeta? Good reads all the way through.
Just before break a friend handed me a copy of The Art of Racing in the Rain by Garth Stein and told me I was going to love it. Sorry. Didn't. It isn't that I don't like philosophy books hidden inside novels, I do. My favorite is Illusions by Richard Bach followed closely by Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. My husband is reading Eat, Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert and tells me I'm going to like it when he's done (saw the movie and enjoyed that, so looking forward to reading the book).
No, I'm afraid I'm just not the target audience of The Art of Racing in the Rain, kinda the same way I'm not really the target audience for Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance --and pretty much for the same reasons. The metaphor just doesn't resound with me. I'm not into car racing, so didn't relate to Racing because Stein used that extended metaphor to get his philosophies across. Plus, I'm not a dog person. Don't really like dogs (have been afraid of them ever since I can remember) and while the narrator of the book (Enzo, the protagonist's dog) is one cool animal, I still am not a dog person.
So don't let my shrug towards The Art of Racing in the Rain dissuade you. You like dogs? You'll enjoy it. You like the races? You'll like this book. You like philosophy? You'll like this book. Me? I'm just odd that way...
Play safe, everyone!
Diana
PS. Do you find the links helpful? I'm never sure if anyone uses them to learn more about the authors or to look at the books? Drop me a comment or an email and let me know?
Decided I didn't want to wait to borrow the rest of the Hunger Games series, so went out and bought Catching Fire and Mockingjay. I really liked Suzanne Collins' writing style. She's clean and sparse, yet I never had trouble envisioning the characters in my head. Am I the only one, though, who sees a young Sean Astin in the role of Peeta? Good reads all the way through.
Just before break a friend handed me a copy of The Art of Racing in the Rain by Garth Stein and told me I was going to love it. Sorry. Didn't. It isn't that I don't like philosophy books hidden inside novels, I do. My favorite is Illusions by Richard Bach followed closely by Ishmael by Daniel Quinn. My husband is reading Eat, Pray, Love by Elizabeth Gilbert and tells me I'm going to like it when he's done (saw the movie and enjoyed that, so looking forward to reading the book).
No, I'm afraid I'm just not the target audience of The Art of Racing in the Rain, kinda the same way I'm not really the target audience for Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance --and pretty much for the same reasons. The metaphor just doesn't resound with me. I'm not into car racing, so didn't relate to Racing because Stein used that extended metaphor to get his philosophies across. Plus, I'm not a dog person. Don't really like dogs (have been afraid of them ever since I can remember) and while the narrator of the book (Enzo, the protagonist's dog) is one cool animal, I still am not a dog person.
So don't let my shrug towards The Art of Racing in the Rain dissuade you. You like dogs? You'll enjoy it. You like the races? You'll like this book. You like philosophy? You'll like this book. Me? I'm just odd that way...
Play safe, everyone!
Diana
PS. Do you find the links helpful? I'm never sure if anyone uses them to learn more about the authors or to look at the books? Drop me a comment or an email and let me know?
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Writing the synopsis
I debated quite a while before deciding to go ahead and post this workshop. At one point, the synopsis was a necessary step to selling your novel. If the purpose of the cover letter was to get the editor/agent
to read the synopsis, then the purpose of the synopsis was to get the editor/agent to request the full manuscript. With more authors not going the agent route or opting to self-publish, however, the synopsis is needed less often for that purpose.
Then again, there are many authors who start with the synopsis. They flesh out their entire story before sitting down to write it out. Those writers are "plotters" and I discussed that approach here. For those, the synopsis is an important writing tool whose importance is vital. I did this only once and only because there were three of us writing intertwining stories so we all had to be sure our plot lines and characters meshed (for the record, I hated it and haven't done it since). Remember, I'm a pantser, so, with only the one exception, I always write my synopses after I've written the novel.
The guidelines below are written with selling in mind. although there are lots of reasons to write one even if you're not using it to snag that agent or editor. Is it for you to work out a plot complication or character arc? Will you be using any of it in the description boxes of some of the self-publishing sites? Who, besides you, is going to see it?
The answers to those questions will go a long way toward quelling any nervousness you might feel at condensing your story. With any luck, the "rules" below will take away the rest of the stress. :)
Rules of thumb for writing a synopsis:
The guidelines below are written with selling in mind. although there are lots of reasons to write one even if you're not using it to snag that agent or editor. Is it for you to work out a plot complication or character arc? Will you be using any of it in the description boxes of some of the self-publishing sites? Who, besides you, is going to see it?
The answers to those questions will go a long way toward quelling any nervousness you might feel at condensing your story. With any luck, the "rules" below will take away the rest of the stress. :)
Rules of thumb for writing a synopsis:
1. If you're writing a synopsis because you're sending your manuscript to a publisher and it's required, first find out what the editor/publisher wants! Some want only
2 pages, others want more. Check their websites; many publishers put their
requirements right out there. The current trend is to shorter a shorter
synopsis.
2. Length – when all else fails, 1-2 pages of synopsis for
every 100 pages of manuscript. Another alternative is to give one paragraph to
each chapter.
3. Write it in present tense, and in 3rd person.
4. Tell the ENTIRE story, including the ending. Fill it with
spoilers!
5. That said, stick to the MAIN plot. Unless the subplot
eventually weaves into the main one, it’s best to leave it out.
6. Write spare. Don’t fill it up with adjectives and
adverbs.
See? Nothing to be afraid of. It really isn't that bad. The biggest thing to remember is that you're telling, not showing your story.
There are TONS of websites that will give you lots of conflicting advice. My guidelines come from my own experience and from Absolute Write (the site uses The Lady and the Tramp as a model. Language is simplistic, but certainly easy to follow!). And if you're still nervous, have others read it over for you, preferably people who haven't read your novel. They'll tell you if they're confused or if you're saying too much.
I've been offering these writing workshops for several months now. You can view the entire list of them here. If you've found any of them useful, please consider a donation. Thanks! Diana
Monday, April 09, 2012
Reading books!
Just wanted to bring my "Books Read This Year" list up-to-date. Not too many to add this time, though.
First one to add is The Madonnas of Leningrad by Debra Dean, the book my book club is reading this month. The prologue put me off some and I was concerned about the voice but it got better the more I read. Still felt like she was telling me the story too much though. I prefer to "see" the action more clearly. And, if this is released as a "super ebook", I hope they include pictures of the paintings she described. The word-descriptions were very well done, but I'd like to see the actual paintings as well.
Am also re-reading One Child by Torey Hayden before I teach it. This will be my sixth or seventh time through the book and it gets to me every time. If you haven't read it, this is a must read.
Last, but not least (actually, none of these three are least. I liked them all, though for very different reasons), is Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. I'd read it before, but wanted to read it again before going to see the movie. Haven't read the other two books yet, so no spoilers! I only got halfway through before we went to see it and I thought the movie stayed true to the spirit of the book even if it changed up some of the details. They make good companion pieces. 'Nuff said. Any more and I'll be breaking my own no-spoiler rule!
That it for now. Play safe and read more!
Diana
First one to add is The Madonnas of Leningrad by Debra Dean, the book my book club is reading this month. The prologue put me off some and I was concerned about the voice but it got better the more I read. Still felt like she was telling me the story too much though. I prefer to "see" the action more clearly. And, if this is released as a "super ebook", I hope they include pictures of the paintings she described. The word-descriptions were very well done, but I'd like to see the actual paintings as well.
Am also re-reading One Child by Torey Hayden before I teach it. This will be my sixth or seventh time through the book and it gets to me every time. If you haven't read it, this is a must read.
Last, but not least (actually, none of these three are least. I liked them all, though for very different reasons), is Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. I'd read it before, but wanted to read it again before going to see the movie. Haven't read the other two books yet, so no spoilers! I only got halfway through before we went to see it and I thought the movie stayed true to the spirit of the book even if it changed up some of the details. They make good companion pieces. 'Nuff said. Any more and I'll be breaking my own no-spoiler rule!
That it for now. Play safe and read more!
Diana
Thursday, April 05, 2012
The Brink of Spring
Every year my husband remarks on how fast the trees go from their first budding to full-leafed in what seems a matter of hours. One day they're budding, the next morning they're all leafed out and ready for summer. I tell him that's just because he's not looking. He sees the start of spring, then gets busy and doesn't look up until he's standing in the shade.
Last year we made a concerted effort to watch the trees unfold. We both remarked on them when the buds appeared and made daily progress comments to each other. Within four days, the trees were decked out in new leaves. Congratulating ourselves, we made a pact to watch every year and not miss a moment of the season's changes.
For many of us in North America, however, this year our Spring awakening is on hold. As early as February, the flowering bulbs started popping up and by mid-March, many gardens were in full bloom. The forsythia blossomed, the fruit trees bloomed and the trees came out with tiny leaf-buds ready to pop.
And then Spring entered a holding pattern. For the past two weeks, nothing has changed. My forsythia is still blossoming, the yellow flowers brighter than I've ever seen them. The daffodils and narcissus are nodding in the breeze just as happy now as they were when they first came out. My hyacinth are still making my garden fragrant and the trees are still budding with their new leaves.
I'm a writer and use words to capture the scene. My husband is a painter. This paused spring gave us the opportunity to really pore over what happens to the trees, giving us the luxury of extended study. You can see his painting here. It's almost as if Mother Nature hit the "hold" button, slowing everything down so we could take a good, long look at the miracle that's wrought every year. The colors are more delicate, and in fact, more reminiscent of autumn with so much of the branches still showing through. The light is brighter, probably because the leaves are still in their infancy. The entire scene speaks of sunlight and promise, just what spring should be.
Soon the seasons will move on again, Mother Nature will let go of the button and send us on our way. But for right now, I'm very much enjoying the extension of a too-brief moment.
Play safe, everyone!
Diana
PS. The link for Steven's painting is a Facebook link. He doesn't have it on his website yet. If you want to see the speed painting, you can go here (it's on YouTube). Be sure to subscribe while you're there! :)
Last year we made a concerted effort to watch the trees unfold. We both remarked on them when the buds appeared and made daily progress comments to each other. Within four days, the trees were decked out in new leaves. Congratulating ourselves, we made a pact to watch every year and not miss a moment of the season's changes.
For many of us in North America, however, this year our Spring awakening is on hold. As early as February, the flowering bulbs started popping up and by mid-March, many gardens were in full bloom. The forsythia blossomed, the fruit trees bloomed and the trees came out with tiny leaf-buds ready to pop.
And then Spring entered a holding pattern. For the past two weeks, nothing has changed. My forsythia is still blossoming, the yellow flowers brighter than I've ever seen them. The daffodils and narcissus are nodding in the breeze just as happy now as they were when they first came out. My hyacinth are still making my garden fragrant and the trees are still budding with their new leaves.
I'm a writer and use words to capture the scene. My husband is a painter. This paused spring gave us the opportunity to really pore over what happens to the trees, giving us the luxury of extended study. You can see his painting here. It's almost as if Mother Nature hit the "hold" button, slowing everything down so we could take a good, long look at the miracle that's wrought every year. The colors are more delicate, and in fact, more reminiscent of autumn with so much of the branches still showing through. The light is brighter, probably because the leaves are still in their infancy. The entire scene speaks of sunlight and promise, just what spring should be.
Soon the seasons will move on again, Mother Nature will let go of the button and send us on our way. But for right now, I'm very much enjoying the extension of a too-brief moment.
Play safe, everyone!
Diana
PS. The link for Steven's painting is a Facebook link. He doesn't have it on his website yet. If you want to see the speed painting, you can go here (it's on YouTube). Be sure to subscribe while you're there! :)
Tuesday, April 03, 2012
Pantsing
No, I'm not talking about what happened in junior high when someone pulled your pants down. I mean pantsing as in "flying by the seat of your pants." And that's what many writers do.
I am an admitted pantser. I start my stories with no clear idea of where they're going to go or what's going to happen. I've tried writing synopses before but, once I finish them, I find I'm no longer interested in writing the story. I already know how its going to turn out, why would I want to spend any more time on it?
So yes, I start, let the characters dictate the story and reel them back in only when I see they're moving too far off the main story line. How do I know the main story line? I write romance and it isn't hard to find. Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl back. Basic plot line.
And that's probably why I spend so much time with my characters and fleshing them out. All my stories are more character-driven than plot driven. We all know the basic plot. The fun is watching new people, people we've never met before, come up with new reactions, new perspectives on the regular old plot. Remember, there are only 37 plots to begin with!
Although I compose my stories on the computer, I have a spiral notebook with pages dedicated to each character. As decisions are made regarding physical appearance, character traits, likes/dislikes, or any other information that comes out in the story, I write it down in the notebook just so I have a reference to go back to when I can't remember his hair color or whether she said she liked Italian food or that it gave her indigestion.
I also include a timeline of events as they unfold. This serves me well after the first draft of the story is written (my "throwing up" on paper, or the computer screen nowadays). Once the entire story is drafted, I can use the timeline to make sure I didn't leave any plot holes or start a subplot and then drop it partway through. Some people might call this plotting, but since I do it AFTER I've written the story, I consider it an editing tool rather than what a true plotter does.
Does this mean I sometimes overwrite? That I write too much story and have to pare down? Of course. But I like it that way. I hate writing the first draft and then finding holes. I'd much rather write extra and have to condense and tighten up the story. In fact, every single novel I've ever published has a companion folder on my computer called "extras". These are pieces of the story I cut out - sometimes only a paragraph in length - sometimes entire scenes. I throw nothing away.
Later those extra pieces sometimes become stories of their own, like "Secret Signs", a cut scene from Secret Submission that is now included in the Timeless Love anthology. Sometimes I change the character names and they become entirely new stories (Love in the Afternoon). And sometimes they just sit there, waiting their turn.
So...are you a pantser or a plotter?
I am an admitted pantser. I start my stories with no clear idea of where they're going to go or what's going to happen. I've tried writing synopses before but, once I finish them, I find I'm no longer interested in writing the story. I already know how its going to turn out, why would I want to spend any more time on it?
So yes, I start, let the characters dictate the story and reel them back in only when I see they're moving too far off the main story line. How do I know the main story line? I write romance and it isn't hard to find. Boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl back. Basic plot line.
And that's probably why I spend so much time with my characters and fleshing them out. All my stories are more character-driven than plot driven. We all know the basic plot. The fun is watching new people, people we've never met before, come up with new reactions, new perspectives on the regular old plot. Remember, there are only 37 plots to begin with!
Although I compose my stories on the computer, I have a spiral notebook with pages dedicated to each character. As decisions are made regarding physical appearance, character traits, likes/dislikes, or any other information that comes out in the story, I write it down in the notebook just so I have a reference to go back to when I can't remember his hair color or whether she said she liked Italian food or that it gave her indigestion.
I also include a timeline of events as they unfold. This serves me well after the first draft of the story is written (my "throwing up" on paper, or the computer screen nowadays). Once the entire story is drafted, I can use the timeline to make sure I didn't leave any plot holes or start a subplot and then drop it partway through. Some people might call this plotting, but since I do it AFTER I've written the story, I consider it an editing tool rather than what a true plotter does.
Does this mean I sometimes overwrite? That I write too much story and have to pare down? Of course. But I like it that way. I hate writing the first draft and then finding holes. I'd much rather write extra and have to condense and tighten up the story. In fact, every single novel I've ever published has a companion folder on my computer called "extras". These are pieces of the story I cut out - sometimes only a paragraph in length - sometimes entire scenes. I throw nothing away.
Later those extra pieces sometimes become stories of their own, like "Secret Signs", a cut scene from Secret Submission that is now included in the Timeless Love anthology. Sometimes I change the character names and they become entirely new stories (Love in the Afternoon). And sometimes they just sit there, waiting their turn.
So...are you a pantser or a plotter?
Thursday, March 29, 2012
New York City
Okay, so my husband and I took a trip to the Big Apple this past weekend because he had tickets to the Art Expo (courtesy of Tim Gagnon -- thanks, Tim!). You have to realize, I love New York. It's my favorite city -- ever. Granted, I haven't been in too many other large cities, but New York has Broadway and off-Broadway and that puts it in a special place in my heart.
While there we went to see Avenue Q and Channeling Kevin Spacey. First one was funny (dirty, but really, really funny) and the second one, well...it wasn't the worst I've ever seen (that honor goes to The Pirate Queen), but it wasn't the best, either. 'Nuff said.
On the train ride home, Steven and I got to talking about how many times we've been down to the city. We live in the Finger Lakes region of NY and the city's only about 350 miles away. Still, it's far enough (and expensive enough!) that we don't get there very often.
I thought. Being the anal-retentive, data-driven person I am, I decided to make a database of all the times I've been to New York City. I started with my first trip back in 1973 when I was a freshman in high school (yeah, okay. Go ahead and do the math. I'll wait. Done? Let's move on...). I recorded the dates (some approximate), my method of transportation, who I went with, the reason for the trip, where I stayed (when I could remember) and what I saw (including tourist sights as well as shows).
From 1973 to last weekend, I'm counting a total of 20 trips in 39 years. I've seen 21 different shows, some musicals, some straight plays, and one mime show (Bill Irwin is the best!) and the Radio City Rockette's Christmas show. I've stayed in at least 10 different places (including on the couch of friends who lived there for a while), eaten in every type of place from a diner to an exclusive club where you had to know someone on the inside just to walk in the door.
I love the diversity, the noise, the smells (did you know NYC smells differently in the summer than in the winter? When its cold, there are chestnut vendors on the streetcorners and the scent of roasting chestnuts permeates Times Square). I love the sights, the museums, the shows, the people (I finally got to see the Naked Cowboy this last trip!!!). Let's just face it, I love New York! :)
While there we went to see Avenue Q and Channeling Kevin Spacey. First one was funny (dirty, but really, really funny) and the second one, well...it wasn't the worst I've ever seen (that honor goes to The Pirate Queen), but it wasn't the best, either. 'Nuff said.
On the train ride home, Steven and I got to talking about how many times we've been down to the city. We live in the Finger Lakes region of NY and the city's only about 350 miles away. Still, it's far enough (and expensive enough!) that we don't get there very often.
I thought. Being the anal-retentive, data-driven person I am, I decided to make a database of all the times I've been to New York City. I started with my first trip back in 1973 when I was a freshman in high school (yeah, okay. Go ahead and do the math. I'll wait. Done? Let's move on...). I recorded the dates (some approximate), my method of transportation, who I went with, the reason for the trip, where I stayed (when I could remember) and what I saw (including tourist sights as well as shows).
From 1973 to last weekend, I'm counting a total of 20 trips in 39 years. I've seen 21 different shows, some musicals, some straight plays, and one mime show (Bill Irwin is the best!) and the Radio City Rockette's Christmas show. I've stayed in at least 10 different places (including on the couch of friends who lived there for a while), eaten in every type of place from a diner to an exclusive club where you had to know someone on the inside just to walk in the door.
I love the diversity, the noise, the smells (did you know NYC smells differently in the summer than in the winter? When its cold, there are chestnut vendors on the streetcorners and the scent of roasting chestnuts permeates Times Square). I love the sights, the museums, the shows, the people (I finally got to see the Naked Cowboy this last trip!!!). Let's just face it, I love New York! :)
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Are you a plotter?
The concept of creation has always fascinated me. How a painter creates a painting, how a carver brings beauty out of a branch, how an author creates life out of a vocabulary of words. The creative process has been dissected by scientists and poets alike, yet still remains more than a mystery.
And yet, for all our differences, writers fall into two creative categories when it comes to sitting down and starting that story. You're either a pantser (as in "writing by the seat of your pants") or a plotter (as in determining the details of your story before begin to write it).
That said, within those two categories, there are hundreds of approaches. Several years ago I interviewed about a dozen authors all of whom called themselves plotters. Each of them spent considerable time hammering out plot points, determining character arcs, nailing down details. Only when they had every piece of information pre-determined, did they actually sit down and write the story. Because they knew everything about the tale so well, the actual writing took, comparatively, very little time.
1. starts with character
She spends between 4 – 12 weeks on this process before actually writing
the story!
1. starts with character bios (in longhand)
The above takes her
“weeks.” Only then does she write her story.
And yet, for all our differences, writers fall into two creative categories when it comes to sitting down and starting that story. You're either a pantser (as in "writing by the seat of your pants") or a plotter (as in determining the details of your story before begin to write it).
That said, within those two categories, there are hundreds of approaches. Several years ago I interviewed about a dozen authors all of whom called themselves plotters. Each of them spent considerable time hammering out plot points, determining character arcs, nailing down details. Only when they had every piece of information pre-determined, did they actually sit down and write the story. Because they knew everything about the tale so well, the actual writing took, comparatively, very little time.
Let me tell you A Tale of Two Plotters:
Author #1
2. makes two lists:
- things she’d like to have happen
- things she knows will happen
3. has a general story flow in her head
4. uses a “plot partner.” Through IM, gets 90% of her plot
figured out
5. writes synopsis
6. does storyboarding
- uses posterboard and different colored sticky notes (one color for protagonist, one for antagonist, perhaps a third color for subplot)
- adds minor scenes; fleshes out the subplot; finds the character arc, keeps the story moving, looks for ironic twists.
7. transfers the contents of the storyboard back to the
synopsis; be sure to tell HOW events happen
8. writes the story
Author #2
2. determines what the character looks like, wears, etc
3. creates a
“conflict grid” for each character including information on their:
- life goal
- story goal
- conflict of circumstance
- conflict of relationship
- conflict of personality
- epiphany
Makes sure the character cannot achieve both the story goal
and the life goal (adds conflict)
4. Makes a “plot grid” by
- dividing the plot into chapters
- filling in all the major plot points
- determining character goals, motivations, turning points
- adds a ‘notes’ line on the grid for pieces of dialogue, descriptions, settings, etc.
5. writes synopsis (more on writing these soon)
So you can see these two authors have very different approaches, yet both are very clear on their story's plot and characters before they write.
The advantages to plotting are obvious. Problems in the story can be located and corrected before the author gets too far into the writing. Because character arc and major (and sometimes minor) plot points are already developed, the author can spend more time on choosing the right words to create believable dialogue and beautiful imagery. And the author isn't surprised when her story takes a sudden right turn because that turn occurred during the plotting process and is now a part of the story (or the author yanked the story back onto the straight and narrow).
Plotting out a story is especially useful for mystery writers. It's very easy to write oneself into a hole if you're pantsing along and now you can't figure out how to get your hero and heroine out of the terrible fix you just put them in. Thrillers, horror stories and mysteries benefit from plotting the story first.
Have I convinced you? Good! Next week I'll tell you all the reasons pantsing a story is more fun!
Play safe,
Diana
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
The 36 Dramatic Situations
Over the centuries millions of stories have been told,
written, acted out or filmed. So there must be millions of plots, yes?
Countless ways for characters to unfold their actions. After all, for every
path chosen, there are dozens left behind.
And yet, you would be wrong. Back in the late 1700’s, CarlosGozzi, an Italian playwright, condensed the plots of plays in an attempt to
find out just how many there were. For example: boy meets girl, boy loses girl,
boy gets girl back. In a nutshell, that’s the plot of every romance novel ever
written. It’s no secret. Think of your favorite romance in any genre. Bet it
can be boiled down to those three actions.
In the mid 1800’s, a Frenchman, Georges Polti, picked up the
task, examining the scripts of ancient Greek plays as well as the more modern
plays being performed on the French stage and determined that, in total, there
were only thirty-six dramatic situations. That’s it! Thirty-six core plots for
the millions of stories that existed.
I first found Polti’s work at a library book sale. There, in
the midst of all the Harlequins, detective stories and Star Trek novels (and
yes, I bought every single ST they had), sat this unassuming book. Thin volume,
had the word “dramatic” on the cover. I picked it up as my husband and I also
collect scripts (imagine an 18-foot long shelf with them so tightly packed you
can’t squeeze another one in and you have our collection thus far).
Of course, Polti’s book is not a script, but an analysis OF
scripts –and their plots. It has had a place of honor on my writer’s shelf ever
since. And I’m not alone.
Over the years, the book has become an invaluable tool for
writers looking to jump-start their writer’s block. It also has had people
searching for that elusive 37th situation. There must be more. There must!
Right?
When I first put this workshop together several years ago, I
found that someone had identified a
new situation and found references to it all over the Web. Unfortunately, I
cannot find attribution anywhere. So yes, a 37th Situation has been identified
(and is included below in the list). Now to find a 38th :).
Polti posed several questions all authors should ask, not
only of their own work, but of what is currently available in the marketplace.
Looking for the Next Big Topic/Genre? Perhaps we have a vision of the future in
these questions:
“Which are the
dramatic situations neglected by our own epoch, so faithful in repeating the
few most familiar? Which, on the other hand, are most in use today? Which are
the most neglected in each epoch, genre, school, author? What are the reasons
for these preferences?”
The book Polti wrote, The
36 Dramatic Situations, was translated into English in the early 20th
century and is available online. For your convenience, the list below lists the
basic plot device and then the characters required for that plot.
What are you waiting for? Read on – and write!
1. Supplication
a Persecutor; a Supplicant; a Power in authority, whose
decision is doubtful.
2. Deliverance
an Unfortunate; a Threatener; a Rescuer
3. Crime pursued by vengeance
an Avenger; a Criminal
4. Vengeance taken for kin upon kin
an Avenging Kinsman; Guilty Kinsman; remembrance of the
Victim; a Relative of both
5. Pursuit
Punishment; a Fugitive
6. Disaster
a Vanquished Power; a Victorious Enemy or a Messenger
7. Falling prey to cruelty/misfortune
an Unfortunate; a Master or a Misfortune
8. Revolt
a Tyrant; a Conspirator
9. Daring enterprise
a Bold Leader; an Object; an Adversary
10. Abduction
an Abductor; the Abducted; a Guardian
11. The enigma
an Interrogator; a Seeker; a Problem
12. Obtaining
(a Solicitor & an Adversary who is refusing) or (an
Arbitrator & Opposing Parties)
13. Enmity of kin
a Malevolent Kinsman; a Hatred or a reciprocally-hating
Kinsman
14. Rivalry of kin
the Preferred Kinsman; the Rejected Kinsman; the Object of
Rivalry
15. Murderous adultery
two Adulterers; a Betrayed Spouse
16. Madness
a Madman; a Victim
17. Fatal imprudence
the Imprudent; a Victim or an Object Lost
18. Involuntary crimes of love
a Lover; a Beloved; a Revealer
19. Slaying of kin unrecognized
the Slayer; an Unrecognized Victim
20. Self-sacrifice for an ideal
a Hero; an Ideal; a Creditor or a Person/Thing sacrificed
21. Self-sacrifice for kin
a Hero; a Kinsman; a Creditor or a Person/Thing sacrificed
22. All sacrificed for passion
a Lover; an Object of fatal Passion; the Person/Thing
sacrificed
23. Necessity of sacrificing loved ones
a Hero; a Beloved Victim; the Necessity for the Sacrifice
24. Rivalry of superior v. inferior
a Superior Rival; an Inferior Rival; the Object of Rivalry
25. Adultery
two Adulterers; a Deceived Spouse
26. Crimes of love
a Lover; the Beloved
27. Discovery of the dishonour of a loved one
a Discoverer; the Guilty One
28. Obstacles to love
two Lovers; an Obstacle
29. An enemy loved
a Lover; the Beloved Enemy; the Hater
30. Ambition
an Ambitious Person; a Thing Coveted; an Adversary
31. Conflict with a god
a Mortal; an Immortal
32. Mistaken jealousy
a Jealous One; an Object of whose Possession He is Jealous;
a Supposed Accomplice; a Cause or an Author of the Mistake
33. Erroneous judgement
a Mistaken One; a Victim of the Mistake; a Cause or Author
of the Mistake; the Guilty One
34. Remorse
a Culprit; a Victim or the Sin; an Interrogator
35. Recovery of a lost one
a Seeker; the One Found
36. Loss of loved ones
a Kinsman Slain; a Kinsman Spectator; an Executioner
And a “new” one!
37. Mistaken Identity
a person who believes him/herself to be someone else; getting away with an action while someone else is blamed
a person who believes him/herself to be someone else; getting away with an action while someone else is blamed
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Reviews
As an author I'd love to say I don't pay any attention to my reviews. That I just write the best book I can, I put it out there and then move on to the next one.
Pffft. Baloney on that! I read every single review that comes my way, good or bad. Bad ones don't bother me too much -- every book won't please every person. That's okay. That's why we have variety in life. If someone didn't like the book, ah well...here's hoping you'll like the next one.
But good reviews? Those can put me in a good mood for days. And when a book I wrote gets a "top pick" or a "gold star" review? Oh, yeah, then I'm sitting pretty and thinking all's right with the world.
So let me give a special shout out to Night Owl Reviews for their recent review of Services Rendered. Sandibuck gave it a 5 -- the rare Top Pick award and I'm doing the happy dance. Click the link above to read her review.
And, if you've already read the book, feel free to stop in on the Amazon page or the EC page and leave your own thoughts about it!
Play safe, and Happy St. Patrick's Day!
Diana
Pffft. Baloney on that! I read every single review that comes my way, good or bad. Bad ones don't bother me too much -- every book won't please every person. That's okay. That's why we have variety in life. If someone didn't like the book, ah well...here's hoping you'll like the next one.
But good reviews? Those can put me in a good mood for days. And when a book I wrote gets a "top pick" or a "gold star" review? Oh, yeah, then I'm sitting pretty and thinking all's right with the world.
So let me give a special shout out to Night Owl Reviews for their recent review of Services Rendered. Sandibuck gave it a 5 -- the rare Top Pick award and I'm doing the happy dance. Click the link above to read her review.
And, if you've already read the book, feel free to stop in on the Amazon page or the EC page and leave your own thoughts about it!
Play safe, and Happy St. Patrick's Day!
Diana
Thursday, March 15, 2012
This year's books
Last year I didn’t keep track of the books I read and
partway through the year realized that was a mistake. I missed having a list I
could look at and say, “Hey, this is how I’ve been spending my time. I’m not
just playing solitaire on the computer or watching old movies on Netflix!”
So this year I’ve decided to take that up again and make
note of the books I read. I’m off to an admittedly slow start, having completed
only four books since January first and partly finished another.
When my husband asked me what I wanted for Christmas I told
him a new fantasy series to read. Fantasy is my first love as a genre and I’ve
been through all the classics and a bunch of others. He took my wish to heart
and got me all the Recluce novels by L.E. Modesett, Jr. All 24 of them. J
I decided to read them in the order in which Modesett wrote
them and so started with The Magic of Recluce. Towers of the Sunset is the second and I’ve also finished that one. I liked the first one
better only because of his use of the present verb tense in TofS. Didn’t know how much I liked past
tense in storytelling until I read Towers
of the Sunset. The verb tense kept pulling me out of the story. And that's too bad, because the stories themselves are compelling. The other issue I had (have?) is that there is no indication within the book of WHEN in the timeline of the overall story each novel takes place. Only after I'd read nearly a third of TofS did I realize that it took place in the far distant past to what had occurred in MofR. Confused? So was I.
Several of us at my day job formed a book club this year.
The first book we chose to read was The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. Wow. THAT is an incredible story about an
event that still pisses me off. Henrietta’s cancerous cells were taken from her
uterus and sent to a lab without her knowledge. I won't say much more or this entire post could be about just this one book and me on my soapbox. I have but four words on the subject: go buy it now!
Our second book, TheLincoln Lawyer by Michael Connelley is the one I didn’t finish. I bought the book
late (ebook, read on my Cruz), but found the noir style a little hard to get
into. Interesting, but didn’t really engage me. Thus, I did something I haven’t
done since I had to read sixteen novels in sixteen weeks for a marathon lit
class in college: I read half the book then skipped to the end and read the
last three chapters.
The last book I read was Homeplace
by Anne Rivers Siddons. I’d never read her work before and found this one when
I browsed the stacks at my local library (three cheers for browsing!). The
blurb led me to believe the story was a romance, but once inside its far more a
story about going home and coming to a fullness of understanding than it is a
romance. I enjoyed it and will look for other books by Ms. Siddons.
That’s it so far. Will group the books I read into a post
periodically just for record-keeping’s sake. If you’ve read any of these books,
what did you think of them?
Addendum: I’ve been ill the past few days and didn’t post
this when I intended. As a result, I read another book, For the Earl’sPleasure by Anne Mallory. Interesting plot twist for a Regency. Won’t give
it away as it’s a cute and easy read. I found it difficult to attend to at
times, but I suspect that was my illness and not the book’s fault.
Addendum the second: I was REALLY sick this week and ended up curled in a chair for another 2 days after I wrote the last addendum. All I did was read. It was wonderful :). So adding two more to the total for the year. Have now read two-thirds of the Nora Roberts trilogy, Sign of the Seven: Blood Brothers and The Hollow. As a rule, I don't go in for spooky stuff, but these are REALLY, REALLY, REALLY good!
Okay, with four REALLYs in one paragraph, I think it's time to call it quits!
Play safe, everyone :)
Diana
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
better late than never
Have been ill the past several days and today got something worth celebrating. Blogged about it over at the Scribes...go on, take a look...you're going to celebrate, too!
Writing Erotica
WARNING: this is a long blog post and the subject matter
concerns the sexual act.
Attitude
Ellora’s Cave published my first erotic romance, Secret
Submission, in September of 2003. The following March I attended my very
first Romantic Times Convention, held in New York City that year. With wide
eyes and a fledgling’s eagerness, I went to this massive gathering of
like-minded people, ready to take my place in the pantheon of published
authors.
On the afternoon of my first day at the convention, after
having spent the morning attending workshops geared toward making me an even
better writer, a group of authors hosted a “meet and greet” opportunity. I took
advantage of the opportunity not only to meet the authors hosting the soiree,
but to meet others as well.
One author in particular stood out. We’d exchanged
pleasantries and she told me a great deal about her books and who she wrote for
(meaning her publisher). Then she looked at me and asked me what sub-genre of
romance I wrote in. Blithly, I answered, “Contemporary Bondage.” I didn’t know
jaws could drop that far.
To her credit, she recovered quickly and said, “I didn’t
even know there was such a genre.” I assured her there was and that I wasn’t
the only author writing in it. She smiled, made a polite excuse to leave and
headed across the room.
That was my first glimmer that writing erotica wasn’t
perhaps as accepted as I thought it might be. In those early years, however, I
found many people who’s glances became decidedly judgmental when they found out
what I wrote. Heck, I even wrote a piece entitled, “So You Want to be a BDSM writer?” for Amazon, partly to warn other beginning writers what they might be
in for.
So if you really want to walk this path, remember, you’ve
been warned! J
Romance/erotic romance/porn
But you’re still here and you’re still reading, so let’s get
into the subject of today’s workshop, yes? How is writing erotica different
from writing other genre?
The easy answer? The sex. In erotica, there’s lots of sex.
Lots and lots of sex. And then there’s some more sex, followed by a generous
helping of sex and finished of with, you guessed it, sex.
So what’s the difference between erotica and porn? Or heck,
even erotica and some mainstream romances that get pretty darn steamy?
Think of the romances your mother read, or grandmother read
if you’re under 35. In those traditional romances the hero and heroine kissed,
went into the bedroom, the door shut and the chapter ended. When the story
picked up, it was morning. The reader knew full well what happened behind that
door, but that’s where it remained – out of sight.
But readers wanted more and romance authors complied. Read
most modern day romances and the hero and heroine kiss, go into the bedroom and
the reader goes in with them, standing at the bottom of the bed and watching as
they make love. We’re voyeurs, still apart from the act, yet getting to see the
love.
“More, more, more!” Cried the readers. And so erotic romance
was born. The hero and heroine kiss, they enter the bedroom, and the readers go
under the sheets with them. Body parts are referred to, passion is ignited, we
watch the hero’s hands as he fingers her pussy and brings her to a climax.
Some people, of course, feel that crosses the line to porn
yet there is a very distinct difference between porn and erotica. Porn is sex
for sex’s sake. There’s nothing wrong with that, but the only purpose of porn
is to excite the libido by showing the sexual act.
Erotica has that same sex, yes. It isn’t erotica without it.
But in erotica, the sex is not gratuitous. It has to be part of the story. All
the sex that occurs MUST occur within the confines of the plot or character
development.
Think of it this way. In porn, the book/movie exists only to
show you sex. In erotica, the book/movie exists to tell you a story and, by the
way, there’s a lot of sex involved. The characters must be believable, even if
they are doing acts the reader only dreams of doing.
Balancing the physical with the emotional
One of the tricks to writing erotica is getting the emotions
to balance with the physical actions. This is perhaps the hardest part when
you’re starting out. Writers get so involved in one or the other that the scene
becomes confusing. How did his hand get over there? How does she feel about
that?
Which, of course, leads to another trap beginning erotica
writers fall into. Make sure the
positions you put your characters into are actually possible. You’d be
surprised how often you’ve changed their positions in your imagination, but
have forgotten to write it down. Wait, her hands were tied behind her back, how
can she put them around his neck???
My advice is to write the positions first. Take your time
and note their reactions, their feelings as they go through the sexual scene,
but get the physical action recorded so it flows continuously. Then go back
through and add in the good stuff. Remember, sex without passion is porn at its
worst, so this is where you really want to amp up the heat index. Make us feel
what they’re feeling. And use all your senses.
Remember, people having sex make noises. Slurping, sloshing,
smacking noises. Let us hear them. Be wary, however, of setting these words
outside the action. Describe the snap of the whip as it splits the air in two
over her head rather than going for the onomatopoetic, yet thoroughly
unsatisfying single word followed by an exclamation point: “Crack!” That plain
word is the sign of a lazy writer.
Vocabulary
Speaking of word choices, a word here about “sexy” vs.
“non-sexy” words. Readers have become sophisticated over the years and the
purple prose of yester-year no longer rings true to today’s audiences. So
please, no more “mounds of pleasure,” or “cave of wonders.” No more “throbbing
manhoods” or “family jewels.” Women have breasts and vaginas or pussys. Men
have penises and testicles or cocks and balls. Call ‘em what they are, folks.
Sidenote: I’ll never forget the first time I read aloud from
my work in Second Life. I was used to writing the words and didn’t think twice
about it—until I got to the word “cock.” Writing the word and saying it out
loud in front of a group of people are two totally different things. I could
see it approaching on the page and turned bright red on my side of the computer
screen. My mind desperately tried to figure a way to rewrite the sentence and
avoid saying that word. Alas, my brain froze, however, and my mouth kept
rattling on, the word getting closer and closer. Finally, I took a deep breath,
rushed through the sentence and just kept going really really fast, hoping no
one would notice.
Of course, they did and I got teased about it for quite some
time. They made me feel more comfortable with saying the words out loud and by
the time I stopped giving readings in SL, the words no longer bothered me.
Still won’t say them in front of my mother, though. J
Final thoughts
The cardinal rule of writing applies to erotica probably
even more than it does to any other genre: If you’re bored writing it, readers
are going to be bored reading it. To put it crudely: if it turns you on? You’re
going to turn on your readers, too.
Play safe!
Diana
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Last Day of Read an Ebook Week - and news
This is it, folks. Be sure to get these titles while they're on sale!
I've decided against closing down my old Yahoo! Group, but I will no longer update it, either. I've changed the homepage so it directs here. Sign up for the newsletter by using the subscription box in the upper left corner of the blog. If you're reading this in a viewer, you'll have to click through to see it.
Speaking of the newsletter, if you already receive it, be sure to open the email when you get it. If you only read it in a reading pane, it doesn't register as opened and I have no idea if people are just tossing it into their trash without reading it or if they're reading it with baited breath in their reading pane. I'm a data junkie, so help me out and open the newsletter email all the way?
Just finished edits for Sahara Heat --which you already know if you get my newsletter. :) What I can include here but forgot to put into the newsletter is a sneak peak at the cover.
I've written two different blurbs for this Quickie. Here's the short one:
I've decided against closing down my old Yahoo! Group, but I will no longer update it, either. I've changed the homepage so it directs here. Sign up for the newsletter by using the subscription box in the upper left corner of the blog. If you're reading this in a viewer, you'll have to click through to see it.
Speaking of the newsletter, if you already receive it, be sure to open the email when you get it. If you only read it in a reading pane, it doesn't register as opened and I have no idea if people are just tossing it into their trash without reading it or if they're reading it with baited breath in their reading pane. I'm a data junkie, so help me out and open the newsletter email all the way?
Just finished edits for Sahara Heat --which you already know if you get my newsletter. :) What I can include here but forgot to put into the newsletter is a sneak peak at the cover.
I've written two different blurbs for this Quickie. Here's the short one:
Agreeing to meet archaeologist Josef Anderson, Carla isn't
at all sure she's not being set up on a blind date from halfway around the
world. But one look at the tall, handsome Norse god who is into bondage and all
things BDSM and Carla's ready for his Sahara Heat.
And here's the long one:
When her best friend calls her from the Sahara Desert ,
Carla Braun suspects an ulterior motive. Nevertheless, she agrees to meet Dr.
Josef Anderson and hear him out, even if she suspects her friend of setting her
up on a blind date from the other side of the world.
But Dr. Anderson proves to be far more interesting than the
story he has to tell and when he suggests a dinner date, Carla can’t help but
be intrigued. When a slip of the tongue reveals the good doctor’s kinkier
side…Carla is very willing to make his short stay in the city a trip he won’t
soon forget.
Which one do you like better?
Not sure on the publication date, but I know it's coming soon!
Last news for today, I'm blogging over at the Scribes tomorrow, so be sure to stop by and say hello!
Play safe,
Diana
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
The Big Goodbye
No, I'm not going anywhere. But your characters are in today's workshop!
The Big Goodbye…creating
scenes of leave-taking
It's important to remember that people leave all the time, whether
its the simple run to the grocery store, a son leaving for the military...or
someone dying in your arms.
These are all scenes where goodbyes happen. The pathos one
wants to create depends on the level of emotional engagement you want from the
reader at that particular moment. A simple goodbye kiss as a husband leaves for
work can have little or no impact on the reader....until he doesn't come home
again, having died in an auto accident or a shooting at the local convenience
store.
It's the author's job to decide the level of emotional
import a scene has...and then craft it accordingly. It's equally important to
remember that every scene must move the plot or the character development
forward in some way.
Leave-taking could mean a son going off to college or two
people saying farewell for a time or for forever.
Activity
Either choose two characters you've already created and
write a scene where they must part, or, if you have no work in progress for this activity, create new characters and a new story
that starts with a leave-taking. Decide the level of emotional involvement you
want from your readers (from a shoulder-shrug to openly weeping) and aim for
that in your scene.
Remember what you learned in the workshop on the stages of
grief. Some of that may apply to your scene as well.
As always, writing is what I do for a living. A donation helps to keep the homefires burning and food on the table. Thanks!
Sunday, March 04, 2012
Celebrate the E-book!
And to help you celebrate, use the coupon codes for a discounted price!
Choose a book below that you want to download, and click on the link. Then use the coupon code printed in the sidebar to get your discount. It's easy, its fun...and a great way to celebrate!
Click here to purchase Table for Four for 50% off!
Click here to purchase Tales from the Ramayana at 50% off!
Click here to purchase Timeless Love for 50% off!

Click here to purchase Hardship and Hardtack for 50% off!
Choose a book below that you want to download, and click on the link. Then use the coupon code printed in the sidebar to get your discount. It's easy, its fun...and a great way to celebrate!
Click here to purchase Table for Four for 50% off!
![]() |
| 50% off! |
NOTE: I Stay a Little Longer is not on sale because it's already priced at 99 cents. Don't let that stop you from picking up this short, slice-of-life story!
Click here to purchase Tales from the Ramayana at 50% off!
Click here to purchase Timeless Love for 50% off!

Click here to purchase Hardship and Hardtack for 50% off!
![]() |
| 50% off
Click here to purchase Yours to Command at 26 % off!
|
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Writing tools -- new toys!
Thanks to the good folks over at Wondermark (a fun webcomic...if you're not following, you should be!), I found Tagxedo, you can make pictures with words. Just paste in the URL, twitter feed or other text and voila! A great new way to look at what you write. To the left is a picture of this blog.
I've used Wordle before and found it to be a great tool for determining which words I use more frequently than others. To the right is the same URL for this blog, but notice it's picked up on different words.
Both tools are fun to use and can be useful to a writer in finding habit words. Or use it to compare two different drafts of the same short story. Just cut and paste your text into the sites and see what happens!
Give it a shot and see what happens!
Play safe, Diana
PS. Remember, I am a writer first. Feel free to donate and keep me out of the attic garret!
I've used Wordle before and found it to be a great tool for determining which words I use more frequently than others. To the right is the same URL for this blog, but notice it's picked up on different words.
Both tools are fun to use and can be useful to a writer in finding habit words. Or use it to compare two different drafts of the same short story. Just cut and paste your text into the sites and see what happens!
Give it a shot and see what happens!
Play safe, Diana
PS. Remember, I am a writer first. Feel free to donate and keep me out of the attic garret!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

.jpg)








